[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
We’re not in terrible shape, but we’re not in good shape either.
Survey sent:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2012-06/msg00192.html |
There were 11 responses:
devA devB devC devD devE devF devG devH devJ devK devL |
Here is a rough summary of the 11 responses. 4 developers (devA, devE, devJ, devK) did not report any “problematic” reasons. Of the remaining 7 developers, the reported problems are:
Patch-handling (git branch, countdown, staging, etc) | devB, devC, devF, devH, devL, |
Mailing lists arguments | devB, devC, devG, |
maintenance procrastination; things not getting done | devC, devH, |
lack of people with specific responsibilities (particularly mentors) | devC, devD, |
lack continuous integration environment and really automated testing | devB |
no feeling of “teamwork” | devC, |
too long / too much effort to produce stable releases | devC, |
number of open issues (overwhelming, demoralizing) | devC, |
difficult to contribute with windows and a slow computer (lilydev is not suitable) | devG |
feeling that other people could complete a task much quicker | devH, |
time spent reading+writing emails | devH, |
Reviews (lack of quantity, to much nitpicking of words) | devH, |
lack of overall vision or roadmap | devH, |
Obvious “policy” problems to discuss in the coming weeks: patch handling, stable releases, roadmap, better testing.
Mailing list arguments are a trickier issue. It’s clearly a big problem, but this isn’t something we can fix by waving a change of policy. I’ll schedule a time to discuss it. We need to do something about this, although at the moment I have no immediate suggestions.
Lack of people with responsibilities, mentors, lack of reviews, type of reviews, things not getting done, number of open issues: I don’t see many “policy” that can help with this (other than generally encouraging people to spend more time and/or eliminating things which drive people away). It’s certainly to note that these are problems, though. The best I can think of is to clarify who is currently responsible for what, and make the vacancies more apparent. Again, I’ll schedule a time to discuss these.
There are a few problems that I can’t see any real “project” solution to: difficult to contribute with windows, feeling that other people could finish tasks faster, time spent reading+writing email. I suggest that we simply acknowledge that those are problems, but focus discussion on other issues.
[ << ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
This document was generated by Graham Percival on September 22, 2012 using texi2html 1.82.